The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it's three fats and a glycerol backbone and if those three fats are composed any of those three fats can be an unsaturated fatty acid and that's probably why you know we're seeing a correlation between triglycerides potentially and heart disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there was this one fraction that was like SF 20 to 40 or something like that because it was very not dense it was like one of the least dense ones on the very top that was the one that correlated the most with dying from a heart attack at that time and what is that triglyceride that's pure fat