The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they looked at how they had they were women included in the studies but how many presented the data for the different Sexes like what happened to men versus what happened to women it was only 50% of the Articles actually did Sex specific differences and how this medication affected this process or whatever and then the ones that did 30% of women had poorer outcomes and and the other and on the flip side 10% of men had poorer outcomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.