Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
i'm cautiously optimistic but what i mean by cautiously optimistic is i'm not certain and i i i've never claimed certainty that ldl doesn't cause atherosclerosis at a concentration level but that said given the information i've seen to date given everything that i've looked at in particular when i look at combination data i have come to a different conclusion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.