We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
they're not specific you could say and riter would tell you in the scenario you described where but God coronary calcium is there already but their CRP is perfect that maybe that's a stable plaque that's not going to rupture herself
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I I I I just think that that inflammatory markers are probably not specific enough or in the case that I just gave even sensitive enough at low low levels of this disease in particular