The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it turns out and they were heavily estrogen — dominated rather than progesterone — they did and they still to some extent increased the risk of developing clouds so women back in the 70s who took oral contraceptives and smoked had a very very high incidence of developing uh clots and and Es schic strokes and clots elsewhere in the body
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.