The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this was actually a study where they gave healthy aged women l-carnitine so a supplement that's been shown to be beneficial a supplement that's found in meat and organs one of the benefits of eating organs and meat is that you'll get more l-carnitine and if you give women l-carnitine it increases tmao it increases trimethylamine and oxide but not markers of atherosclerosis and healthy women
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
other vascular adhesion molecules vascular cell adhesion molecule one intracellular adhesion molecule one or lipid profile markers that's about as detailed a cardiovascular risk profile as you're ever going to get and pressing their tmao pushing their tmao up with l-carnitine didn't change any of that