The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, the simple version of looking at this and the way I would've thought this would all go was, okay, two people start kissing, they start talking about what they find particularly romantic and arousing for them. And their brain waves will just match to one another. And that's really the basis of romantic attachment and romantic engagement in that sort of thing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then that rever the coolest thing is this reverberates down to your body so uh if I if our brains begin to align our hearts actually begin to beat together even if we have different resting heart rates uh you to breathe together and you start to move together you start to look at the same things in the environment we've talked about attention when you look at something the same thing you're getting the same data and that a feedback loop which I think now you can see that that is a way to coordinate behavior