The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We did it with hemorrhagic stroke, we did it with ischemic stroke, we did it with peripheral nerve injury, we did it with spinal cord injury, and we finally said, "This is working so well, we should go try this in humans."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We've now gone all the way through animal studies showing that animals with stroke benefit from physical therapy, but they don't make a complete recovery. When we add this brief burst, they make recoveries they couldn't otherwise make.