Peter Attia· MD
So when you look at the stages of lesions, calcification is a very late process. You described it earlier as basically the repair of damage.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So when you look at the stages of lesions, calcification is a very late process. You described it earlier as basically the repair of damage.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the calcification is the it's sort of the repair that's absolutely correct the calcium per se is not the problem it is it is that it tells you something bad has happened and that's such that's so important for people to understand it's you know if anything that calcium is probably doing more benefit than harm