Andrew Huberman· PhD
what we do is we don't allow them to go to 100% in lateral Crunch at impact they go to 95% so they're not stubbing their toe or slamming into the pain sensitizer just stay off the D sensitizer now
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what we do is we don't allow them to go to 100% in lateral Crunch at impact they go to 95% so they're not stubbing their toe or slamming into the pain sensitizer just stay off the D sensitizer now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.