We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
he had the data that showed that cigarette smoking caused heart attacks he did the research to some of the seminal research to show that was quoted later but about cigarettes cause heart attacks he did the research and he in his Time magazine interview in 1961 said well I don't think it's cigarettes a lot of people are saying that but they don't know they're not studying fats and I think it's fats
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.