Andrew Huberman· PhD
Cardiac Health
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Cardiac Health
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I would also say if anyone has cardiovascular issues they should avoid cannabis just because that's more of like I would say a being safe because I don't know how to actually explicitly say what I would say the harms associated with it are but I think there is something there I've seen enough evidence that's like starting to coales into um a story that's like there's something here so I would that's where I would say that I think there's risk