The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know erectile dysfunction as you know it's sort of the inability to consistently achieve and maintain an erection and it's fairly common um you know of all the conditions I see that's definitely the number one so you know if you look at men over the age of 40 over half will have some trouble trouble with erections under age of 40 is probably about 15 to 20%
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
52 % of men over the age of 40 suffer from erectile dysfunction some degree
40% of men at 40 had some degree of Ed 50% at 50 60% at 60 70% at 70