The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the third thing is perhaps the most important context is everything context is everything ldl does it directly injure the endothelium and cause atherosclerosis or is it a bystander or is it a repair mechanism that is getting pulled in because it is if if it is either of the latter two cases it could associate with cardiovascular disease in those people who are metabolically unwell but not be causing it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
is ldl the arsonist or is it just a innocent bystander or even a fireman that comes to the rescue of a damaged cell membrane