Andrew Huberman· PhD
The United States is very stubborn on this, and it's due to a couple of really weird personalities in the lipid world.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
The United States is very stubborn on this, and it's due to a couple of really weird personalities in the lipid world.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the european guidelines the canadian guidelines are in line with the available evidence and the united states guidelines are you know just 40 years out of date
so some some guidelines uh like the american heart association guidelines uh which are um probably the less favorable for lpa measurement they'll tell you to measure i don't remember exactly but in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or with a family history of atrocious cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or in patients with aortic valve stenosis