Paul Saladino· MD
but that's a disservice though to people when it's only one risk factor of many
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but that's a disservice though to people when it's only one risk factor of many
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the system the system like you say it's litigation and also the system screams for simplicity so the whole medical system seems to have gravitated to well rather than looking at the complexity of what you discussed we'll just say it's the particle number is the biggest thing and get every doctor to just look at the particle number but that's a disservice though to people when it's only one risk factor of many
And, you know, the whole concept that you can reduce heart disease to one number is just foolhardy, right?
The whole concept that you can reduce heart disease to one number is just full heart.