Paul Saladino· MD
most cardiac radiologists would say that a year or two of elevated ldl is enough to see meaningful plaque progression in the arteries
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most cardiac radiologists would say that a year or two of elevated ldl is enough to see meaningful plaque progression in the arteries
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
most cardiac Radiologists uh would agree that even within a year if your LDL is at 300 you should see some PL formation it doesn't take that long