The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the younger you are the more you blood tells me about your risk of cardiovascular disease so a 40 year old person who otherwise doesn't have like some dramatic you know LP little a through the roof or something crazy the blood tells me probably eighty eighty-five percent of what I need to know
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So the way I tell patients is the younger you are, the more your blood tells me about your risk of cardiovascular disease. So a 40 year old person who otherwise doesn't have like some dramatic, you know, LP little a through the roof or something crazy, the blood tells me probably 80, 85% of what I need to know.