The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the variables that we know michael pincinis calculated we were account for about 20 percent of the variance in risk okay that's about it that's not such a that's not such a large number that's a it's a small number
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
When you have some very strong predictors of heart disease risk, blood pressure, diabetes, even LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, use standard measurements. And you throw them into a risk formula and you add in age and sex, you can explain a lot of risk that way.