The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But when n=10s of thousands who have benefitted from increasing meat/organs and reducing the most toxic plant foods in their diet... It's high time to consider the hypothesis that an #animalbased diet could help millions more thrive.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
avoid the most toxic parts of plants and i believe you'll thrive this is what an animal-based diet is
i'm saying for some people consider the fact that there's a spectrum of plant toxicity that's what animal-based diet is all about it gives people a lot more freedom because ultimately what i want and that i think what many people in this space want is for you to feel better and the people you love to have a higher quality of life