The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think plants can harm some people and that statement alone is so radical to the general population that's kind of what carnivore is about for me like hey if you're not well like think about the fact that plants can harm you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I am persuaded that for a subset of a population who's dealing with these kinds of issues that it can be a powerful intervention and that plant toxins for that subset are probably a bigger problem than they are for other people