Paul Saladino· MD
those of us on carnivore diets to check inflammatory markers like H s CRP it's very very very low it's like 0.03 you know it's super super low it's not even a question there's no inflammation
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
those of us on carnivore diets to check inflammatory markers like H s CRP it's very very very low it's like 0.03 you know it's super super low it's not even a question there's no inflammation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and I think what we're talking about here is the fact that ketogenic and carnivore diets change many of these markers in a way that could be interpreted as a negative when in fact it's probably not the same as inflammation
so many of these criticisms against the carnivore diet don't hold up when we look at the clinical data there are more and more carnivores who are doing labs and we do not see a tendency toward inflammation