The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
1930 there was a study published in the British Medical Journal of a year-long a year-long investigation of two people in Bellevue Medical Hospital who are eating an exclusive cardboard diet and during that period of time those people experiencing no negative effects no dangerous changes in blood pressure kidney function they only experienced good things a little bit of weight loss and came out of the study saying that they felt better than when they started
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the longest research study I'm aware of is a year long done on Villa Mir Steffensen and another gentleman in Bellevue Hospital they were observed directly for a year and they had no changes in blood pressure weight or anything negative happen to them on a gnosis hill carnivore diet
in 1930 there was a study published in the British the British medical journal of a a yearl a yearlong investigation of two people in Belleview Medical Hospital who are eating an exclusive carnivore diet and during that period of time these people experienced no negative effects no dangerous changes in blood pressure kidney function they only experienced good things a little bit of weight loss and came out of the study saying that they felt better than when they started