Paul Saladino· MD
But wearing a CGM and looking at this data, this is essentially probably even better than a fasting insulin at telling you about what your insulin sensitivity is.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But wearing a CGM and looking at this data, this is essentially probably even better than a fasting insulin at telling you about what your insulin sensitivity is.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what I discovered with my CGM my continuous glucose monitor was that I was more insulin sensitive in the morning which is normal human physiology
how his insulin sensitivity was looking at his glucose in real time and if it helped him make behavioral change for the positive
it really gives a very precise indication of insulin sensitivity
use a continuous glucose monitor with a company like nutrasense know what your glucose is doing but don't follow glucose follow your insulin sensitivity through your glucose metrics
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.