Andrew Huberman· PhD
This information can help you make smarter choices to support your health both now and in the long term.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
This information can help you make smarter choices to support your health both now and in the long term.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, if you're seeing real time, okay, I'm getting concrete data like what I just ate is causing my glucose values to skyrocket, then it's like, okay, I'm going to adjust that one meal.
It's having tools that help identify things early and help you actually create a plan that you can stick to. You know, knowledge is one thing and behavior change is another. So any tool that is a win-win for both, I think it's it's something powerful that everyone should have in their toolbox.
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.