The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can prove that by doing a continuous glucose monitor like you guys heard about last week on the podcast you can do that with a fasting insulin you can do that looking at a visceral adapost tissue so talk about Imaging you could get a you could get a dexa scan looking at your visceral adapost tissue which would be another good thing to do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
two things to know how metabolically healthy you are wear a continuous glucose monitor we'll get you one or and and or get a fasting insulin
get a fasting blood sugar wear a continuous glucose monitor get a fasting insulin
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.