The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Uh, so she had what? two eggs and a piece of toast and avocado. And so that's less than 70 grams of carbs for sure. It's probably 20 grams of carbs and the glucose spikes to about what 180 and then it takes about 4 hours to come back down to normal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
she had what two eggs and a piece of toast and avocado and so that's less than 70 grams of carbs for sure it's probably 20 grams of carbs and the glucose spikes to about what 180 and then it takes about four hours to come back down to normal so that's completely abnormal I would not that's insulin resistance in a graph if you will so that's not what we want to see it all
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.