Paul Saladino· MD
deviation is 11. So it's quite low, which is what you really want. On this day, my max was 113. I was in range quote, you know, meaning I was less than 140. 100% of the day, no spikes.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
deviation is 11. So it's quite low, which is what you really want. On this day, my max was 113. I was in range quote, you know, meaning I was less than 140. 100% of the day, no spikes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and i always want to make sure i'm able to stick to that standard of hey average glucose is always going to be below 100 standard deviation is always going to be below 15 which gives me a sense of how much it's cycling and therefore how low i'm keeping insulin levels
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.