Paul Saladino· MD
I learned so much about my blood sugar my response to carbohydrates with AC GM with a continuous glucose monitor from nutri cents
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I learned so much about my blood sugar my response to carbohydrates with AC GM with a continuous glucose monitor from nutri cents
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But you can engage with it as much as you want or just, you know, engage with it two or three minutes per day is enough to really be getting a lot of insight into your own metabolism.
As long as I engage with the app and I take a picture of my food and everything, I get the email the next day, and that tells me what happened to my glycemic response the whole day. And it also gives me a weekly thing. So all I have to do is just engage with the app once a day, and it sends me like a daily report and also a weekly report where I could see like every day.
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.