The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in a man crazy long outcome trial it did seem to work they budged a lot of statistics I think in retrospect on and didn't have the type of sister yell our C's yes so there was a little proof that not only what Framingham said is true cholesterol is a risk marker a risk factor depending on how you want to label it by lowering it rule does reduce clinical events
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.