The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and lo and behold farming knew ultimately they're gonna have to do serious outcome trials and the first group of people they studied who were Swedish guys who survived in MI and had an LDL cholesterol of 190 so these patients had ever retrospect their FH patients you know who's got an LDL cholesterol once definition one of the definitions of that page and giving them a dose of simvastatin got your 25 so percent reduction in clinical events so outcome data bingo great drug
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.