Andrew Huberman· PhD
the dopamine system is not very good at understanding opportunity costs. That is what we would be doing in those 14 years and what we would be enjoying and the enrichment that we would get if we were to live into those 14 years.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the dopamine system is not very good at understanding opportunity costs. That is what we would be doing in those 14 years and what we would be enjoying and the enrichment that we would get if we were to live into those 14 years.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.