Andrew Huberman· PhD
But the other way is it synchronizes the temperature under which those cells exist. So temperature is actually the effector of the circadian rhythm.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But the other way is it synchronizes the temperature under which those cells exist. So temperature is actually the effector of the circadian rhythm.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But temperature is the effector. Now, you can also shift your circadian rhythm with eating.