We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
those patients had macular degeneration and they were losing their sight but they could still see to some extent they had their own adapost tissue taken she sorted it for certain uh stem cells meenal stem cells and it was reinjected into the into the eye should have been safe right their own cells even and as as you say several of them went blind irreversibly irreversibly so
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.