The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this relates to fire together wire together although um it highlights the Together part how closely in time do two neurons need to be active in order for them to subsequently increase their connectivity and indeed one of them needs to be active a little bit before the other one in order for it to work optimally right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are fascinating studies to be done you think about Spike timing dependent plasticity a term that that your viewers may not all know but is a is related to how neurons adjust their strength of connectivity to one another according to the timing of the signals in those cells mechanisms like that tell us wow the brain really cares about the very precise timing of stuff and to the degree that that influences the way that neurons do or don't strengthen their connections to one another it's so fundamental in everything from memory to visual function what have you