The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now imagine you and I are passing a basketball back and forth except you're wearing goggles and all of a sudden you're only getting 90% of the data of where's that basketball on its way to my hands now you're only getting 80% now you're only getting 70% of that visual information and you are practicing right you are getting good at catching a basketball when you only have a fraction of the visual information
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.