Peter Attia· MD
but you need to see a specialist in how to do that because you can do it the wrong way and make patients worse it's got to be very targeted in how you approach this with patients and every patient's different
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but you need to see a specialist in how to do that because you can do it the wrong way and make patients worse it's got to be very targeted in how you approach this with patients and every patient's different
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are highly effective treatments with this injury is this the sort of thing where there's a relatively finite window in which you or the physician treating has to be able to access the patient and the further a patient is from that window absent the Natural History resolution the more difficult that gets