The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well, one of the things that we think dopamine is involved in in terms of information processing is valuing the world computing if you will the value of taking this action or that action, the value of grabbing this and putting it in my mouth and drinking water etc. Okay? And the Parkinson state is sort of like a flat value function. You can't really see differential value in things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.