The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we don't actually know the impact of this on long-term cognition do we i think the on cardiovascular and cancer it's pretty clear that they will have a benefit not clear with respect to dementia not clear with respect to immune function and certainly not clear with respect to the diseases of frailty in fact i should say it is clear with respect to the diseases of frailty they're much much more susceptible
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.