The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
another method of protecting the brain was tried called mild hypothermia and that uh was a process of reducing the brain temperature and body temperature just a few degrees from 37° centigrade to 33 and we were one of the first to to show um that that was protective even after the stroke in animals
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it blocks partly the release of those exitor amino acids glutamate it blocks the calcium influx it blocks the inflammation
in animal models and again this is something that I've I've published extensively on hypothermia is Magic for acute brain injuries right if you can decrease core temperature by 3 to 4 degrees cius for you know three you know 24 hours to 72 hours after the injury you you get a significant reduction in in brain injury in one specific scenario and that's acute um acute uh brain injury in babies that have some kind of issue around birth therapeutic hypothermia so cooling to 33.5 degre Celsius core temperature for three days is the standard of care it was brought into the resuscitation guidelines in 2010