The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the developing brain is able to learn through passive experience because the neurons, the nerve cells in the developing brain are much more over-connected than they will be later in life.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You know, so as you of course know, the the brain starts out, you got essentially a fixed number of neurons. There's some debate about whether there's a few new neurons born in humans or not. Put that aside. What happens is over the first two years, those neurons
And from there, it's just a matter of pruning an overgrown garden. And that's all that's happening. And and the way the pruning happens is based on what you're experiencing in the world.
What happens is over the first two years, those neurons connect more and more and more and more. And what you end up getting is this hyperconnection by the time you're two years old.