The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
really the bulk of the subsequent literature that is the majority of quality peer-reviewed studies on this aspect of mental training visualization point to the fact that there are no significant differences between males and females in terms of their ability to mentally visual visualiz nor their ability to use that mental visualization toward improving cognitive or motor skills
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.