The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
As you well know, your brain is locked in silence and darkness. It's trying to make a model of the outside world. And its whole goal is to make a successful model. And when it succeeds at that and says, "Oh, okay, wait. I I've got good predictions about what's going on." Then it stops changing. I That's its goal is to stop changing. And if you're constantly pushing and challenging it with things it doesn't understand, then it'll keep changing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.