The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A previous guest hypothesized, I don't think this was based on real data, hypothesized that, you know, like if you go to a concert now, everyone's taking photos of the concert. Yeah. Um, as opposed to just experiencing the concert, they hypothesized that, uh, perhaps people have more memory of the photo taking experience and the photo than the actual experience
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.