The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
coming out of non-rm sleep it was very sort of analogical it was very what we think of as um very sort of convergent very focused way of trying to logically solve the problem but with REM sleep it was much more Divergent fluid intelligence it was almost as though they were just standing back and waiting for it and then it just popped out in front of them all the letters kind of reorganized and and clicked into place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the association creativity benefit of sleep was very different that cross-linking benefit came by way it seemed of REM sleep because when we woke them up out of REM sleep compared to non-rem sleep they were 30% more capable of solving these anagrams