Andrew Huberman· PhD
those are neonates who have lack of blood flow for some reason to the brain when they're when they're born and if you cool them it's been shown in studies up to 10 years later that they have better cognitive outcomes
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
those are neonates who have lack of blood flow for some reason to the brain when they're when they're born and if you cool them it's been shown in studies up to 10 years later that they have better cognitive outcomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in one specific scenario and that's a cute um acute brain injury in babies that have some kind of issue around birth therapeutic hypothermia so cooling to 33.5 degrees Celsius cold temperature for three days is the standard of care it was brought into the resuscitation guidelines in 2010.