The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think for a long time, we were hoping there'd be an easy fix. If someone had a problem, it'd be nice. If they just had too much blood, we can give them some leeches, drain the blood out, they'd be back to good, right? That's how George Washington died. But now we're learning, most people don't have four or five things that are right or wrong. They've got billions, but they're all changeable at any stage in life.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.