The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the frontal L probably has 25 different sub regions within it and and so grossly we think about the frontal loes as the lateral portion of the frontal loes which is involved in these executive function probably supports these exective function abilities but then we've got another part of the frontal loes called the orbital frontal cortex which is probably involved more in Social and emotional Behavior
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then you'll have the the opposite where patients with the lateral damage will have executive functions but they seem emotionally intact
if you have just damage to these frontal to these areas that are kind of in the overal frontal lobe you will have many different impairments that we would call sort of social or emotional impairments and they're executive function will be quite normal