The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Is it possible? Is it within the realm of reality based on what we know about human genetics that there could be genes that select for say um rapid updating of of visual scenes combined with um short-term memory or whatever duration of memory is required that would afford certain people certain advantages in this based on inheritance that's then combined with training.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.