The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know we scientists like to think that we're very rational creatures and we're not subject to fads but we totally are right when I started out in this field um in the early 80s everything was about opioid peptides and then there was a period where gaseous neurotransmitters like nitric oxide were all the rage and you know right now glea are in the spotlight for good reason
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.